Skip to main content

Tyler v. State

Citations

  • 903 N.E.2d 463
  • 2009 Ind. LEXIS 337
  • 2009 WL 885879

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the trial court’s imposition of 6 consecutive sentences was justified because Tyler committed offenses against multiple victims
  • concluding because the defendant committed his offenses against more than one victim, the imposition of consecutive sentences on two Class A child molesting convictions was justified
  • noting that the protected persons statute allows for the admission of otherwise inadmissible hearsay
  • discussing how the protected persons statute addresses and protects the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right of confrontation
  • noting the defendant’s claim that the trial court erred by running enhanced sentences consecutively and that it had rejected a similar claim in Robertson
  • noting prerecorded statements inadmissible through PPS may nevertheless be admissible under Rules of Evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Part I, Part II, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.