Appleton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \we cannot definitively declare that the State placed [the witness] on the stand for the sole purpose of impeaching him\
• holding that “we cannot definitively declare that the State placed [the witness] on the stand for the sole purpose of impeaching him”
• explaining that Rule 801(d) limits admission of prior statements as substantive evidence to certain circumstances
• explaining that Rule 801(d) limits admission of prior statements as substantive evidence to certain circumstances
• “Reciting segments of [the] pretrial statement was [] superfluous. The only purpose such recitation could have would be to get the details of [the] former statement before the jury as substantive evidence.... ”
• “Reciting segments of [the] pretrial statement was [] superfluous. The only purpose such recitation could have would be to get the details of [the] former statement before the jury as substantive evidence . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).