Anglemyer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[s]o long as the sentence is within the statutory range, it is subject to review only for abuse of discretion”
• concluding that “[s]o long as the sentence is within the statutory range, it is subject to review only for abuse of discretion”
• holding that a sentencing court “does not abuse its discretion in failing to consider a mitigating factor that was not raised at sentencing”
• holding that the relative weight or value assignable to aggravating circumstances is not subject to review for abuse of discretion
• holding that relative weight or value assignable to mitigating circumstances found by trial court is not subject to review
• holding that trial court considered and rejected a potential mitigator when the factor was discussed by the trial court but omitted from the sentencing statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).