Skip to main content

Cooper v. State

Citations

  • 854 N.E.2d 831
  • 2006 Ind. LEXIS 887
  • 2006 WL 2830866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s contention was waived because it was “supported neither by cogent argument nor citation to authority”
  • holding that the defendant’s contention was waived because it was not supported by citation to authority
  • holding that the defendant’s contention was waived because it was supported neither by cogent argument nor citation to authority
  • holding that the defendant’s contention was waived because it was “supported neither by cogent argument nor citation to authority”
  • holding that the defendant’s contention was waived because it was “supported neither by cogent argument nor citation to authority”
  • holding that the defendant’s contention was waived because it was “supported neither by cogent argument nor citation to authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

195 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.