Indiana Supreme Court· 8/8/2007

Robertson v. State

Citations

871 N.E.2d 280
2007 Ind. LEXIS 618
2007 WL 2258260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that trial courts sentence a defendant under the sentencing statutes in effect at the time the defendant committed the offense
explaining the application of Indiana Code § 35-50-2-1.3(c) and revealing the lack of merit in Dodd’s argument that the statute required the resentencing court to impose an advisory term for each of his convictions
explaining the application of INDIANA CODE § 35-50-2-1.3(c) and revealing the lack of merit in Dodd’s argument that the statute required the resentencing court to impose an advisory term for each of his convictions
court could find aggravator in criminal history based on conviction occurring between instant offense and sentencing
“Although Robertson was sentenced after the amendments to Indiana’s sentencing scheme, his offense occurred before the amendments were effective so the pre-Blakely sentencing scheme applies to Robertson’s sentence.”
“Although Robertson was sentenced after the amendments to Indiana’s sentencing scheme, his offense occurred before the amendments were effective so the pre-Blakely sentencing scheme applies to Robertson’s sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Rucker, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.