Skip to main content

Laster v. State

Citations

  • 956 N.E.2d 187
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1856
  • 2011 WL 5074260

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to continue when weighing the unlikelihood of finding a witness whose location was unknown against the inconvenience and expense of rescheduling a trial
  • reducing aggregate sentence for multiple convictions for burglary and robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Crone, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.