Skip to main content

Pierce v. State

Citations

  • 677 N.E.2d 39
  • 1997 Ind. LEXIS 16
  • 1997 WL 83711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that child witness was available for cross-examination where she was on the witness stand during the protected persons hearing, the court did nothing to prevent the defense from questioning her, yet the defense conducted no actual cross-examination
  • explaining that the decision not to cross-examine the victim at a protected person hearing is “readily explainable as a tactical judgment that nothing useful could be accomplished with such a small child”
  • stating motive to fabricate and use of age-appropriate terminology are factors to be considered in determining reliability
  • defendant cannot claim loss of right to meet witnesses \face to face\ if face to face meeting took place and defendant failed to question witness
  • defendant cannot claim loss of right to meet witnesses “face to face” if face to face meeting took place and defendant failed to question witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Dickson, Selby, Shepard, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.