Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 964 N.E.2d 920
  • 2012 WL 1018712
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that a finding that one is a habitual offender is a sentence enhancement imposed upon the conviction of a subsequent felony and should not be treated as a separate sentence
  • “It is well settled that a habitual offender finding does not constitute a separate crime, nor does it result in a separate sentence. Rather, a habitual offender finding results in a sentence enhancement imposed upon the conviction of a subsequent felony.”
  • “It is well settled that a habitual offender finding does not constitute a separate crime, nor does it result in a separate sentence. . . . Rather, a habitual offender finding results in a sentence enhancement imposed upon the conviction of a subsequent felony.”
  • “It is well settled that a habitual offender finding does not constitute a separate crime, nor does it result in a separate sentence. . . . Rather, a habitual offender finding results in a sentence enhancement imposed upon the conviction of a subsequent felony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crone, Darden, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.