Indiana Court of Appeals· 10/13/2011
Davis v. State
Citations
- 956 N.E.2d 726
- 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1815
- 2011 WL 4846186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that evidence was sufficient to show that defendant, who used her tongue in kissing child, acted with intent to satisfy sexual desires based on defendant’s conduct and “the natural and usual sequence associated with ‘tongue kissing’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bradford, Robb, Barnes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-03-03· cited 320×
- Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-05-24· cited 116×
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1987-12-29· cited 104×
- Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-04-14· cited 90×
- Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-02-28· cited 43×
- Tyler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 42×
- Nuerge v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-03-13· cited 39×
- Pedrick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-06-16· cited 25×
- Cornelius v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-06-24· cited 24×
- M.T. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-05-07· cited 22×
- People v. CalusinskiAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-07-11· cited 20×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-03· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.