Skip to main content
· 4/12/2012

Mastin v. State

Citations

  • 966 N.E.2d 197
  • 2012 WL 1227933
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the evidence of penetration was sufficient to support defendant’s child molesting conviction based on defendant’s statements that he would push aside victim’s underwear and “rub on” her vagina with his penis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Robb, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.