Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/9/1996
Taylor v. State
Citations
- 939 S.W.2d 148
- 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 206
- 1996 WL 577796
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, if Taylor’s objection could not have been fairly construed as relating to the voir dire restriction, then Taylor would have waived error
- reasoning that the tenets of Ake could, in principle, require the appointment of a DNA expert to assist the defense
- where record is clear that trial court understood objection and legal basis therefore, error is preserved despite appellant’s failure to state magic words “I object”
- where context was clear from record, error was preserved despite failure to state “magic words,” “I object”
- where record is clear that trial court understood objection and legal basis therefore, error is preserved despite appellant's failure to state magic words \I object\
- “If appellant demonstrated the complexity of the issues involved and the importance of the requested expert testimony vis-a-vis a viable defense, then he would have been entitled to a DNA expert”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mansfield, McCormick, White, Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
98 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-15· cited 716×
- Skinner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-05-21· cited 330×
- Jimenez, Ex Parte Rosa Estela OlveraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-04-25· cited 212×
- Franks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-24· cited 191×
- Flores, Ex Parte GerardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-12-05· cited 139×
- Murray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-02· cited 104×
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15· cited 84×
- Booker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-03-20· cited 82×
- Lemasurier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-11-21· cited 81×
- Hollingsworth v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-03-30· cited 75×
- Haliburton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-07-03· cited 61×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-31· cited 61×
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-03-03· cited 55×
- Smith, William A/K/A Bill SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-06-08· cited 50×
- Brink v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-06-06· cited 49×
- Gutierrez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-11-09· cited 46×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-14· cited 45×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-03-01· cited 44×
- Cesar Gomez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-23· cited 41×
- Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-03· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.