Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/18/1984

Taylor v. State

Citations

352 N.W.2d 683
1984 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding “the withholding of cumulative testimony will not ordinarily satisfy the prejudice component of a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel”
stating if “it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice,” a court should so rule
considering a claim of ineffective assistance based on the idea counsel should have called other witnesses and evaluating whether the applicant “has adequately shown the nature of the testimony that the[] witnesses would have given”
considering a claim of ineffective assistance based on the idea counsel should have called other witnesses and evaluating whether the applicant “has adequately shown the nature of the testimony that the[] witnesses would have given”
“we require more than a showing that trial strategy backfired or that another attorney would have prepared and tried the ease somewhat differently”
“[W]e require more than a showing that trial strategy backfired or that another attorney would have prepared and tried the case somewhat differently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, Larson, Schultz, Wolle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.