Jeffery Yates v. State of Tennessee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “claims for post- judgment jail credit are not cognizable habeas corpus claims”
• concluding that “claims for post-judgment jail credit are not cognizable habeas corpus claims”
• concluding “that claims for post-judgment jail credit are not cognizable habeas corpus claims”
• “The proper avenue to address post- judgment jail credit for prisoners is through the TDOC administratively.”
• “The proper avenue to address post-judgment jail credit for prisoners is through the TDOC administratively”
• “The proper avenue to address post- judgment jail credit for prisoners is through the TDOC administratively.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).