Supreme Court of Minnesota· 11/6/2003

Taylor v. State

Citations

670 N.W.2d 584
2003 Minn. LEXIS 716
2003 WL 22510356

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a sentencing departure may be based on multiple acts of uncharged sexual penetration, which were part of the offense for which the defendant was charged and convicted
noting that a sentencing departure may be based on multiple acts of uncharged sexual penetration, which were part of the offense for which the defendant was charged and convicted
stating that ‘“[s]ubstantial and compelling circumstances’ are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case”
stating that “‘[s]ubstantial and compelling circumstances’ are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case”
reversing an upward durational departure for first- degree criminal sexual conduct because the statute for the offense already accounted for age
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those circumstances that make the facts of a particular case different from a typical case.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Russell, Meyer, Blatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.