Indiana Supreme Court· 2/14/2006
Taylor v. State
Citations
- 842 N.E.2d 327
- 2006 Ind. LEXIS 128
- 2006 WL 328816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the factors leading to our conclusion that impounding [the defendant’s] car was not warranted by police administrative care-taking functions [under the Fourth Amendment analysis] support the conclusion that the requirements of the Indiana Constitution were violated as well”
- concluding the impound was unreasonable in part because it was unclear that Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1975 | May 29, 2019 Page 7 of 11 vehicle was parked illegally, and, in any event, vehicle was not a potential hazard to public safety
- “Automobiles are among the ‘effects’ protected by Article 1, Section 11.”
- “Automobiles are among the ‘effects’ protected by Article 1, Section 11.”
- “The fact that [defendant] was unable to drive his car because his permit was suspended does not in this instance support a conclusion that the car itself was imperiled or constituted a potential hazard which [the police officer] reasonably believed he needed to address.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-11-09· cited 46×
- Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-09-10· cited 42×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-09· cited 34×
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-07-11· cited 32×
- Montgomery v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-04-20· cited 25×
- Lamont Wilford v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2016-02-26· cited 21×
- Danner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-29· cited 19×
- State v. LucasIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-01-17· cited 18×
- Julian Tuggle v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-05-22· cited 16×
- Powell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-11· cited 15×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-11-15· cited 11×
- Buckley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-05-01· cited 10×
- Peters v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-06-10· cited 9×
- Meister v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-04-27· cited 8×
- Engram v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-09-19· cited 8×
- Carl Croom v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-10-16· cited 8×
- Moise Joseph v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-02· cited 8×
- C.P. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-23· cited 8×
- Phillip Whitley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-07· cited 8×
- Robert Weathers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-08-17· cited 8×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-07-11· cited 181×
- Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-12· cited 151×
- Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 121×
- Halsema v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-09· cited 85×
- State v. BulingtonIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 80×
- Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-30· cited 78×
- Gibson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-07-31· cited 70×
- Trowbridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-04· cited 56×
- Peete v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1997-04-09· cited 26×
- Woodford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-03· cited 21×
- Manalansan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-11· cited 20×
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 8×
- Finney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-04-17· cited 7×
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.