Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 109 S.W.3d 443
  • 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 156
  • 2003 WL 21509021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing Cain had overruled certain cases to extent they required automatic reversal for judge’s “improper hypothetical in voir dire”
  • recognizing Cain had overruled certain cases to extent they required automatic reversal for judge’s “improper hypothetical in voir dire”
  • discussing harm analysis of voir dire error when jury not called on to consider subject of error
  • suggesting difference between a victim’s punishment recommendation from a non-victim’s in a harm analysis of error resulting from the trial court’s mistaken hypothetical as to punishment in voir dire
  • suggesting there may be difference between admissibility of complainant’s and non-complainant’s punishment recommendations
  • “Where the same evidence or argument is presented elsewhere during trial without objection, no reversible error exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.