Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 131 S.W.3d 497
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 636
  • 2004 WL 743852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a variation exists between the oral pronouncement of sentence and the written memorialization of the sentence, “the oral pronouncement controls”
  • holding that when the oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment vary, the oral pronouncement controls
  • holding that fine should have been deleted from written judgment when trial court did not orally pronounce fine during sentencing
  • holding that fine should be deleted from judgment because it was not orally pronounced when deferred adjudication was revoked
  • holding that fine should have been deleted from written judgment when trial court did not orally pronounce fine during sentencing
  • holding that, in the context of deferred adjudication, the order adjudicating guilt sets aside the order deferring adjudication, including any previously imposed fine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

459 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.