Tenth Circuit· 11/22/2017

Sylvia v. Wisler

Citations

875 F.3d 1307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the “most prudent and fair course is to allow the district court to address this [alternative] claim in the first instance on remand”
noting that this court does not ordinarily review issues raised for the first time in a reply brief
noting that this court does not ordinarily review issues raised for the first time in a reply brief
stating that Mr. Merrill’s father made Mr. Merrill’s law partner, Wilson Busby, a co-trustee and that Mr. Merrill became a co-trustee with Mr. Busby after his father passed
explaining that in resolving matters of state law, federal courts \must defer to the most recent decisions of the state's highest court\ (quoting Kokins v. Teleflex, Inc. , 621 F.3d 1290 , 1295 (10th Cir. 2010) )
defining parol evidence to include \prior or contemporaneous ... understandings tending to vary the terms of the contract\ (quoting Decatur Cty. Feed Yard, Inc. v. Fahey , 266 Kan. 999 , 974 P.2d 569 , 574 (1999) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Holmes, Matheson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.