Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court should assume as true the plaintiffs specific factual allegations when ruling on a motion to dismiss
• noting that “[t]he nature and specificity of the allegations required to state a plausible claim will vary based on context”
• holding that to prevail on a class-of-one theory, a plaintiff must show it was treated differently from all others similarly situated and that this difficult standard prevents “turning even quotidian exercises of government discretion into constitutional causes”
• explaining that “in ruling on a motion to dismiss, a court should disregard all con-elusory statements of law and consider ... the remaining specific factual allegations”
• stating that this requirement prevents \a flood of claims in that area of government action where discretion is high and variation is common\
• recognizing a plaintiff bears a “substantial burden” to show she is similarly situated in all material respects to comparators who were treated differently (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).