Stump v. Gates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the waiver rule “protects this court from publishing an erroneous opinion because we did not have the benefit of the appellee’s response”
• holding “[t]his court does not ordinarily review issues raised for the first time in a reply brief”
• stating that the “court does not ordinarily review issues raised for the first time in a reply brief”
• explaining that denying sur-reply in such circumstances “robs the [non-movant] of the opportunity to demonstrate that the record does not support [the movant’s] factual assertions and to present an analysis of the pertinent legal precedent that may compel a contrary result.”
• noting the court “does not ordinarily review issues raised for the first time in a reply brief”
• explaining our waiver rule “protects this court from publishing an erroneous opinion because we did not have the benefit of the appellee’s response”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).