Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that every federal circuit court has rejected—and that the Oklahoma Supreme Court would not recognize—brand-name liability under these circumstances
• noting that every federal circuit court has rejected—and that the Oklahoma Supreme Court would not recognize—brand-name liability under these circumstances
• finding that warranty claims alleging a drug was “unfit” or “unreasonably dangerous” were preempted because they would require changing its FDA‑mandated composition or labeling
• explaining that forfeiture rule applies to new theory presented on appeal, even if that theory falls under same general category as argument presented below
• holding that no duty is owed under Oklahoma law
• stating that the plaintiff was aware of the cause of her symptoms when her 6 doctor told her that a certain chemical was “quite possib[ly]” responsible for her symptoms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).