Bronson v. Swensen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \precedent in Potter dictates the finding that there is a compelling state interest in the protection of monogamous marriage.\
• holding “precedent in Potter dictates the finding that there is a compelling state interest in the protection of monogamous marriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).