Skip to main content
· 12/23/2003

Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp.

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 862
  • 63 Fed. R. Serv. 146
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26232
  • 2003 WL 23004762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that under Utah law, a plaintiff must prove a safer, feasible alternative design
  • “Where no controlling state decision exists, the federal court must attempt to predict what the state's highest court would do.”
  • “[W]hen a panel of this Court has rendered a decision interpreting state law, that interpretation is binding on district courts in this circuit, and on subsequent panels of this Court, unless an intervening decision of the state’s highest court has resolved the issue.”
  • “[W]hen a panel of this Court has rendered a decision interpreting state law, that interpretation is binding on district courts in this circuit, and on subsequent panels of this Court, unless an intervening decision of the state’s highest court has resolved the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Henry, McConnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.