Tenth Circuit· 3/6/2007
Hill v. Kemp
Citations
- 478 F.3d 1236
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5203
- 2007 WL 666327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have heard no convincing reason to suppose that Oklahoma fails to provide its citizens sufficient process for challenging its tax laws; very much to the contrary.”
- “claims [that] seek prospective relief, no damages, and are directed (at least nominally
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tymkovich, Ebel, Gorsuch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Shero v. City of Grove, Okl.Tenth Circuit· 2007-12-17· cited 728×
- Wheeler v. CommissionerTenth Circuit· 2008-04-10· cited 356×
- Prost v. AndersonTenth Circuit· 2011-02-22· cited 280×
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. PruittTenth Circuit· 2012-02-28· cited 234×
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusTenth Circuit· 2013-06-27· cited 211×
- United States v. LefflerTenth Circuit· 2019-11-19· cited 200×
- Abernathy v. WandesTenth Circuit· 2013-04-08· cited 174×
- Steak n Shake Enterprises, Inc. v. Globex Co.D. Colorado· 2015-06-23· cited 170×
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionTenth Circuit· 2010-07-09· cited 165×
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonTenth Circuit· 2010-02-02· cited 160×
- Williams v. W.D. Sports, N.M., Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-07· cited 148×
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Tenth Circuit· 2010-08-16· cited 140×
- Howard v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.Tenth Circuit· 2014-04-08· cited 139×
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamTenth Circuit· 2011-05-27· cited 117×
- McKissick v. YuenTenth Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 109×
- United States of America ex v. Keypoint Government SolutionsTenth Circuit· 2019-04-30· cited 98×
- United States v. LamirandTenth Circuit· 2012-01-05· cited 74×
- Penncro Associates, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-24· cited 72×
- Sylvia v. WislerTenth Circuit· 2017-11-22· cited 69×
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2011-06-21· cited 69×
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1996-03-27· cited 3,788×
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 1,977×
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 1,967×
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 1,877×
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 1,658×
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court· 2001-11-13· cited 1,407×
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 1,372×
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesD.C. Circuit· 1992-09-08· cited 1,322×
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 1,298×
- Home Builders Ass'n of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of MadisonFifth Circuit· 1998-07-01· cited 1,070×
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 1,058×
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 882×
- Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 779×
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court· 1976-04-27· cited 703×
- Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 703×
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 593×
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 532×
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 532×
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 522×
Other cases named Hill v. Kemp
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.