Sivetts v. Board of County Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any procedural error that may have been committed would be harmless and does not prevent us from reaching the merits of the district court’s decision”
• concluding any error by district court in considering the defendant’s second motion to dismiss was harmless because the same argument could have been presented in a motion for judgment on the pleadings
• explaining that a defendant does not waive an insufficient-service defense by asserting it in a motion to dismiss before filing a responsive pleading
• explaining that a defendant does not waive an insufficient-service defense by asserting it in a motion to dismiss be- fore filing a responsive pleading
• finding that defendant could have presented Rule 12(b)(6) argument in Rule 12(c) motion
• finding that a plaintiff’s request for leave to file an amended complaint, “unsupported by argument or a proposed [] [a]mended [c]omplaint, was insufficient to notify the court and opposing counsel of the grounds for amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).