Abernathy v. Wandes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary”
• holding that \the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary\
• holding that a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a dismissal without prejudice
• noting that “the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary”
• stating that “the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary.”
• recognizing that the limitation in the savings clause is jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Cox v. Glanz
  Tenth Circuit· 2015-09-08· cited 342×
• Brown v. Buhman
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-05-13· cited 320×
• Johnson v. Spencer
  Tenth Circuit· 2020-02-13· cited 252×
• United States v. Lavabit, LLC.
  Fourth Circuit· 2014-04-16· cited 231×
• Grant v. Royal
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-03-30· cited 209×
• United States v. Leffler
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-11-19· cited 200×
• May v. Segovia
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-07-12· cited 152×
• Bishop v. Smith
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-07-18· cited 114×
• United States of America ex v. Keypoint Government Solutions
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-04-30· cited 98×
• Hale v. Fox
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-07-19· cited 87×
• United States v. Walker
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-03-25· cited 71×
• Sylvia v. Wisler
  Tenth Circuit· 2017-11-22· cited 69×
• United States Ex Rel. Polukoff v. St. Mark's Hosp.
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-07-09· cited 69×
• Frasier v. Evans
  Tenth Circuit· 2021-03-29· cited 69×
• United States v. Clark
  Tenth Circuit· 2013-06-18· cited 68×
• United States v. Trent
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-03-06· cited 65×
• United States v. Watson
  Tenth Circuit· 2014-09-11· cited 63×
• Dutcher v. Matheson
  Tenth Circuit· 2016-11-02· cited 60×
• In re: Syngenta AG MIR162
  Tenth Circuit· 2023-02-28· cited 59×
• United States v. Rodebaugh
  Tenth Circuit· 2015-08-25· cited 58×

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
• Teague v. Lane
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
• Bousley v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 5,336×
• Singleton v. Wulff
  Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 3,831×
• Bailey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyr
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
• Davis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,750×
• Felker v. Turpin
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-28· cited 1,437×
• Begay v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,437×
• Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp.
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-01-26· cited 1,215×
• Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades Council
  Supreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 1,067×
• In Re Ocsulis Dorsainvil
  Third Circuit· 1997-08-15· cited 1,045×
• Boumediene v. Bush
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 1,000×
• Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 948×
• Costello v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 927×
• United States v. Santos
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-02· cited 812×
• Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-03-14· cited 734×
• In Re Cline
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-07-09· cited 706×
• Miller v. Marr
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-04-14· cited 635×
• Chambers v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-13· cited 627×