Abernathy v. Wandes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary”
• holding that \the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary\
• holding that a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is a dismissal without prejudice
• noting that “the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary”
• stating that “the decision regarding what issues are appropriate to entertain on appeal in instances of lack of preservation is discretionary.”
• recognizing that the limitation in the savings clause is jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).