Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/21/2001

State v. Wilson

Citations

35 P.3d 1111
178 Or. App. 163
2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing courts must read the war- rant in a “commonsense, nontechnical and realistic fashion”
“[A]lthough the facts suggest a possibility that criminal evidence might be found at defendant’s residence, that is not the standard to be met here.”
mere fact that a suspect states that he has “lots of methamphetamine to sell” does not establish a “nexus” to any particular location where the drugs are likely to be found
when an affidavit omits material information, the court is to determine whether the omitted facts weaken the force of the facts recited or the inferences that would otherwise be reasonable to draw
“To be sufficient, an affidavit in support of a warrant must permit a conclusion by a neutral and detached magistrate that the items specified in the warrant will probably be found in a specified place to be searched.”
‘Whether an affidavit contains inaccuracies or omits material information is a factual inquiry, and we defer to a trial court’s findings in that regard as long as there is any evidence to support them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.