Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/28/2016

State v. Webber

Citations

281 Or. App. 342
383 P.3d 951
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 1147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a “nuanced, case-by-case assessment” is required
concluding “that the absence of objective facts connecting that illegal activity to [the] defen- dant’s home foreclosed the conclusion that the affidavit pro- vided a sufficient nexus to that location”
concluding “that the absence of objective facts connecting that illegal activity to [the] defen- dant’s home foreclosed the conclusion that the affidavit pro- vided a sufficient nexus to that location”
“[P]robable cause exists only if the affi- davit sets forth facts that create a nexus between the place to be searched and the objects to be found.”
“[P]robable cause exists only if the affi- davit sets forth facts that create a nexus between the place to be searched and the objects to be found.”
stat- ing that “probable cause exists only if the affidavit sets forth facts that create a nexus between the place to be searched and the objects to be found”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.