Oregon Supreme Court· 2/26/1999

State v. Goodman

Citations

975 P.2d 458
328 Or. 318
1999 Ore. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

indicating that the marijuana garden was located on forest land belonging to a particular company while the defendant resided in a nearby town at a house approximately eight and one-half miles from the garden
explaining that, because the “defendant did not move to controvert any of the statements in the affidavit and does not challenge them here,” the court’s review was “limited to whether the uncontroverted facts in the affidavit establish probable cause to search defendant’s house”
“Facts derived from training and experience may contribute [the] necessary factual nexus in a determination of probable cause.”
“Facts derived from training and experience may contribute that necessary factual nexus in a determination of probable cause.”
“Facts derived from training and experience may contribute [the] necessary factual nexus in a determination of probable cause.”
when defendant does not move to controvert statements in affidavit, appellate “inquiry is limited to whether the uncontroverted facts in the affidavit estab-lishfed] probable cause to search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Leeson, Riggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.