Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1/16/2013

State v. Miller

Citations

254 Or. App. 514
295 P.3d 158
2013 WL 174402
2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that affi- davit did not establish probable cause to search the defen- dant’s home for evidence of drug dealing, where, on three recent occasions, the defendant had driven directly from his residence to meet someone to sell a small amount of methamphetamine from his vehicle
holding that a warrant to search the defendant’s home for evidence of drug dealing was not supported by probable cause, where the police witnessed him selling drugs on three occasions, but those sales occurred away from home and there were no Cite as 308 Or App 748 (2021
reversing for a new trial without conducting a harmless error analysis
trial court's abuse of discretion required us to \reverse and remand for a new trial\ on the relevant counts
“In sum, the affidavit [was] insufficient to permit a magis- trate reasonably to conclude that it is more likely than not that the evidence sought in the warrant would be found at defendant’s residence.”
“In sum, the affidavit [was] insufficient to permit a magis- trate reasonably to conclude that it is more likely than not that the evidence sought in the warrant would be found at defendant’s residence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.