· 3/21/2018
State v. Van Osdol
Citations
- 417 P.3d 488
- 290 Or. App. 902
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A ‘plaintiff who is claiming a tax refund must prove [its] case by a preponderance of the evidence.’”
- applying this burden to a claim for a tax refund
- “[a] tax refund suit is a de novo proceeding.”
- “A tax refund suit is a de novo proceeding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Devore, Garrett, James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.