Skip to main content

State v. Harp

Citations

  • 697 P.2d 548
  • 299 Or. 1
  • 1985 Ore. LEXIS 1085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • illustrating process by excising from consideration inaccurate information in an affidavit supporting a search warrant
  • omission of fact that there was a 3/8-mile distance between marijuana and residence, affects inferences that may be drawn from warrant
  • omission of fact that there was a 3/8-mile distance between marijuana and residence, affects inferences that may be drawn from warrant
  • affiant’s omission of information could he evaluated in controversion hearing; in that instance the omitted information deprived the included information of probable cause
  • omission of fact that there was a 3/8-mile distance between marijuana and residence, affects inferences that may be drawn from warrant
  • court assumed that different, but similar, terms in same statute had distinct meanings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.