Skip to main content

State v. Keeney

Citations

  • 918 P.2d 419
  • 323 Or. 309
  • 1996 Ore. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that legislature intends different meanings when it uses different terms in a statute
  • holding that the legislature intends different meanings when it uses different terms in a statute
  • noting that each term in a statute is assumed to have a distinct meaning
  • when information in affidavit is to be excised as intentionally false, trial court entitled to distrust and, therefore, to disregard other information as well
  • in construing the terms \untruthfulness\ and \inaccuracy\ as used in a statute, concluding that the legislature intended different meanings when it used different terms in the statute
  • when trial court finds on motion to controvert that search warrant affiant was false in part of affidavit, it may disbelieve some or all of the rest of the affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.