Oregon Supreme Court· 6/13/1996
State v. Keeney
Citations
- 918 P.2d 419
- 323 Or. 309
- 1996 Ore. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that legislature intends different meanings when it uses different terms in a statute
- holding that the legislature intends different meanings when it uses different terms in a statute
- noting that each term in a statute is assumed to have a distinct meaning
- when information in affidavit is to be excised as intentionally false, trial court entitled to distrust and, therefore, to disregard other information as well
- in construing the terms \untruthfulness\ and \inaccuracy\ as used in a statute, concluding that the legislature intended different meanings when it used different terms in the statute
- when trial court finds on motion to controvert that search warrant affiant was false in part of affidavit, it may disbelieve some or all of the rest of the affidavit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dept. of Transportation v. StallcupOregon Supreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 59×
- State v. CastillejaOregon Supreme Court· 2008-09-18· cited 51×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-11-21· cited 41×
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-03· cited 19×
- Atkinson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court· 2006-09-21· cited 14×
- Gadalean v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Gadalean)Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-04-18· cited 9×
- State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-07-08· cited 8×
- State v. CastillejaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-26· cited 5×
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-14· cited 5×
- State v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-28· cited 4×
- Carrillo v. City of StanfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-23· cited 4×
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-29· cited 4×
- Johnson v. Department of Public Safety Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 736×
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 332×
- State v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 67×
- State v. HarpOregon Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 40×
- State v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-05-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.