Skip to main content
· 10/26/1994

State v. Poppe

Citations

  • 883 P.2d 905
  • 131 Or. App. 14
  • 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the officer’s conduct in gaining access to the premises is not objectionable, no privacy interest is threatened
  • where the officer's conduct in gaining access to the premises is not objectionable, no privacy interest is threatened
  • security measures support inference of indoor marijuana grow operation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rossman, De Muniz Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.