Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/14/2020
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 473 P.3d 1174
- 307 Or. App. 273
- 307 Or. App. 226
- 476 P.3d 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Probable cause exists only if the affidavit sets forth facts that create a nexus between the place to be searched and the objects to be found.”
- probable cause “exists only if the affidavit sets forth facts that create a nexus between the place to be searched and the objects to be found” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- probable cause “exists only if the affidavit sets forth facts that create a nexus between the place to be searched and the objects to be found” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoodmanOregon Supreme Court· 1999-02-26· cited 42×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-11-21· cited 41×
- State v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court· 2006-08-17· cited 30×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-16· cited 28×
- State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-28· cited 19×
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 16×
- State v. CHAMU-HERNANDEZCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-07-01· cited 12×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-06· cited 8×
- State v. KlinglerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22· cited 7×
- State v. MARSINGCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-07-27· cited 4×
- State v. FronterhouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.