Supreme Court of Kansas· 12/7/2007

State v. Brown

Citations

173 P.3d 612
285 Kan. 261
2007 Kan. LEXIS 824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing “indications that the court intended to exclude private or casual conversations from the definition of testimonial statements”
listing these and other factors to consider in determining if an eyewitness’ statement is testimonial
finding statement voluntary even though defendant 7 was handcuffed to a small table in an interrogation room for 12 hours
discussing third factor of whether the \primary purpose of the interview\ was to obtain \proof of facts potentially relevant to a later prosecution of a crime\
appellate court does not reweigh evidence, pass on the credibility of witnesses, or resolve conflicts in the evidence
generally, an appellate court reviews a trial court's determination that hearsay is admissible under a statutory exception for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Davis, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.