Skip to main content

State v. Bridges

Citations

  • 297 Kan. 989
  • 306 P.3d 244
  • 2013 WL 4039431
  • 2013 Kan. LEXIS 657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant possesses the burden to designate a record that affirmatively shows prejudicial error
  • noting that a prosecutor’s personal opinion of a witness’ credibility constitutes unsworn, unchecked testimony and impinges upon jury’s duty to determine truthfulness of witness
  • noting a split of case authority on whether reading of Miranda warnings amounts to a circumstance leading a reasonable person to consider police questioning custodial
  • noting a split of case authority on whether reading of Miranda warnings amounts to a circumstance leading a reasonable person to consider police questioning custodial
  • finding 30-minute interview was \short\ and weighed in favor of interview not being custodial
  • finding 30 minute interview was \short\ and did not suggest defendant was in custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.