Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/22/2007
State v. Henderson
Citations
- 160 P.3d 776
- 284 Kan. 267
- 2007 Kan. LEXIS 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- chronicling post-Davis cases holding statements obtained during interviews in child advocacy centers were testimonial
- de novo standard applies to determination of whether the right to confrontation has been violated
- de novo standard applies to determination of whether the right of confrontation has been violated
- de novo standard applies to determination of whether the right of confrontation has been violated
- de novo standard applies to determination of whether the right to confrontation has been violated
- interview conducted jointly by social worker and detective testimonial; detective continually involved in interview process, initiated interview and involved in decision not to interview or attempt to locate anyone besides defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nuss, Johnson, Brazil
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In the Interest of B.D.-Y.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2008-07-18· cited 492×
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 197×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-12-11· cited 88×
- Coronado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-09-14· cited 82×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-07· cited 82×
- State v. VasquezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-10-17· cited 78×
- State v. SilerOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-25· cited 77×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-28· cited 75×
- State v. BenningtonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-28· cited 71×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-07-27· cited 71×
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-13· cited 53×
- State v. StatenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-08-12· cited 53×
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28· cited 43×
- State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-09-06· cited 39×
- Seely v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-04-10· cited 33×
- State v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-07-27· cited 25×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-22· cited 22×
- State v. McMullenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-12-18· cited 22×
- State v. ApplebySupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-11-20· cited 19×
- State v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-06-19· cited 18×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-02-11· cited 246×
- State v. ElnickiSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 169×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-17· cited 161×
- State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-04-23· cited 90×
- State v. SwaniganSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 88×
- State v. JustusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-21· cited 86×
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 70×
- Rangel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-07-25· cited 57×
- State v. BobadillaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-02-09· cited 52×
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-26· cited 36×
- State v. Giang NguyenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-05-05· cited 33×
- State v. PittCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-15· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.