Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/30/2008

State v. Kirkpatrick

Citations

184 P.3d 247
286 Kan. 329
2008 Kan. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

affirming continuance denial where prior continuance had already been granted and movant did not identify new counsel being sought
defendant answered questions normally and appeared to be tracking, no detectible odor of alcohol or marijuana, and officer did not suspect intoxication
‘Whether a defendant’s due process rights were violated is a question of law over which this court exercises unlimited review.”
\There is no imperfect self-defense version of criminal discharge of a firearm at an occupied dwelling.\
court will not build its analysis on legally defective foundation even if parties fail to preserve issue of legal defect
where juror not shown to have prejudged case and not shown to have improperly influenced other jurors, no abuse of discretion in denying motion to recall jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Nuss, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.