Supreme Court of Missouri· 8/24/2004

State v. Strong

Citations

142 S.W.3d 702
2004 Mo. LEXIS 103
2004 WL 1879000

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Strong did not preserve the issue for appellate review
holding “[g]ruesome crimes produce gruesome, yet probative, photographs, and a defendant may not escape the brutality of his own actions” (internal quotation omitted)
holding it was not an abuse of discretion to allow an officer to testify the defendant was nonchalant
finding there was no plain error from the State’s argument that the defendant would escape justice if sentenced to life without parole
finding deliberation does not require a particular amount of time and can be found when there was an opportunity to terminate the attack
though some justifications for strike were stronger than others, totality of circumstances established that trial court did not clearly err in denying Batson challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Strong

85 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.