Skip to main content

State v. Middleton

Citations

  • 995 S.W.2d 443
  • 1999 Mo. LEXIS 38
  • 1999 WL 431109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking venireperson for cause after statement that venireperson would require proof beyond all doubt
  • finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking a venireperson for cause after a statement that the venireper-son would require proof beyond all doubt
  • discussing abuse of discretion standard applied to the admission of evidence
  • a videotape of the scene of a previous crime committed by the defendant, including bodies of the victims, was admissible during the penalty phase of a death penalty case
  • 34 instances of small or corrected omissions in 4,000-page transcript did not prejudice appellant
  • where a vehicle described in a warrant being executed at a nearby house was found in a field, and an officer observed through the window an adhesive strip on the dashboard that appeared to match the adhesive strip on a clock discovered at a murder scene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

124 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.