Supreme Court of Missouri· 3/6/2012

State v. Tisius

Citations

362 S.W.3d 398
2012 WL 724647
2012 Mo. LEXIS 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

acknowledging that defense counsel’s failure to object to the state’s closing argument results in plain error standard of review pursuant to Rule 30.20
acknowledging . that defense counsel’s failure, .to object to the state’s closing argument results in plain error standard of review pursuant to Rule 30.20
upholding a trial court’s admission of a complaint to which the defendant had pleaded guilty under the hearsay exception for certified court records
noting a properly admitted indictment only serves to prove that the defendant had been charged with a crime, not that the defendant had actually engaged in any criminal conduct
“[T]he failure to object during closing argument is more likely a function of trial strategy than of error.”
a constitutional claim of error must include citation to a specific constitutional section to be preserved for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: George W. Draper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

68 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.