Skip to main content

State v. Strong

Citations

  • 272 P.3d 281
  • 167 Wash. App. 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that extortion involves “compelling of the victim to give up property” and is thus “an extension of theft”
  • noting that extortion involves “compelling of the victim to give up property” and is thus “an extension of theft”
  • discussing Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705, 706, 89 S. Ct. 1399, 22 L. Ed. 2d 664 (1969
  • “[E}xtortion requires the unlawful compelling of the victim to give up property; it is an extension of theft.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siddoway, Sweeney, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.