Supreme Court of Missouri· 2/19/2008
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 244 S.W.3d 144
- 2008 WL 131995
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a finding of intellectual disability was a finding that removed the defendant from consideration for the death penalty and was therefore not the equivalent of an aggravating factor that required a jury determination under Ring
- rule of lenity requires ambiguous criminal statutes to be construed strictly against the state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mary R. Russell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-05-26· cited 156×
- People v. SkinnerMichigan Supreme Court· 2018-06-20· cited 145×
- State v. DeckSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-01-26· cited 98×
- State of Missouri v. Robert Blake BlurtonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-03-15· cited 94×
- State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-03-06· cited 65×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-31· cited 61×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-03-01· cited 57×
- People v. HyattMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-07-21· cited 57×
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-07-16· cited 41×
- State of Missouri v. Christopher L. CollingsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-08-19· cited 32×
- State v. Lopez-McCurdyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-10-27· cited 31×
- State v. PribbleSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-05-26· cited 29×
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-03-13· cited 24×
- State v. MortMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-09-09· cited 21×
- State v. NewmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2008-07-01· cited 21×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-12-20· cited 20×
- State v. AgeeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-10-11· cited 18×
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. RICHARD S. BUMBERYMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-06-21· cited 15×
- State v. VarnellMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-08-31· cited 14×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 596×
- Kansas v. MarshSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 332×
- Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-02-11· cited 331×
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-03-26· cited 285×
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-05-31· cited 246×
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-01-27· cited 239×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-08-26· cited 232×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-07· cited 170×
- State v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-08-02· cited 165×
- Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-04-16· cited 141×
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court· 2002-12-11· cited 140×
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-12-18· cited 139×
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-05-28· cited 139×
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-30· cited 138×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-12-23· cited 131×
- State v. CarsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-03-25· cited 128×
- State v. MayesSupreme Court of Missouri· 2001-12-18· cited 123×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.