Supreme Court of Missouri· 1/26/2010
State v. Deck
Citations
- 303 S.W.3d 527
- 2010 Mo. LEXIS 6
- 2010 WL 290450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that preserved claim of trial court error during closing argument is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
- holding proportionality review warranted death sentence despite defendant’s confession after hiding evidence and providing false alibis to law enforcement
- holding proportionality review warranted death sentence despite defendant’s confession after hiding evidence and providing false alibis to law enforcement
- “[t]he State has wide latitude in closing arguments, but closing arguments must not go beyond the evidence presented”
- “[T]he failure to read a mandatory instruction did not result in plain error if the jury was otherwise conveyed the information.”
- counsel “has wide latitude in closing arguments, but closing arguments must not go beyond the evidence presented”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zel M. Fischer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- S.M. v. E.M.B.R.Supreme Court of Missouri· 2011-01-25· cited 105×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-05-29· cited 98×
- State of Missouri v. Robert Blake BlurtonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-03-15· cited 94×
- State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-10-17· cited 85×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-03-09· cited 75×
- State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-08-13· cited 67×
- State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-03-06· cited 65×
- State of Missouri v. Chadwick Leland WalterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-01-26· cited 62×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-31· cited 61×
- State of Missouri v. Thomas A. EssSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-01-13· cited 61×
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2018-11-20· cited 58×
- State of Missouri v. Jesse DriskillSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-03-31· cited 55×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-01-29· cited 55×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-07-11· cited 55×
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-07-16· cited 41×
- State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-05-31· cited 33×
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-07-03· cited 33×
- State of Missouri v. Christopher L. CollingsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-08-19· cited 32×
- State v. BrightmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-10-02· cited 28×
- Carman Deck v. Richard JenningsEighth Circuit· 2020-10-19· cited 26×
Cites
97 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 1,326×
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court· 2005-06-06· cited 1,051×
- Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,034×
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-05-14· cited 874×
- Uttecht v. BrownSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 596×
- Kansas v. MarshSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 332×
- State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-12-12· cited 326×
- State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 291×
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-02-26· cited 260×
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 259×
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-09-22· cited 246×
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-01-27· cited 239×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-08-26· cited 232×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.