Skip to main content
· 3/26/1996

State v. Tokar

Citations

  • 918 S.W.2d 753
  • 1996 Mo. LEXIS 25
  • 1996 WL 135633

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that seasoned trial counsel often will not enter objections for strategic purposes, because “it is feared that frequent objections irritate the jury and highlight the statements complained of’
  • recognizing that seasoned trial counsel often will not enter objections for strategic purposes, because \it is feared that frequent objections irritate the jury and highlight the statements complained of\
  • denying motion to supplement record on appeal because the information in the supplement was not before the trial court and the opposing party did not have an opportunity to respond to the information
  • denying motion to supplement record on appeal because the information in the supplement was not before the trial court and the opposing party did not have an opportunity to respond to the information
  • inquiry made of defendant regarding waiver of his right to testify during the penalty phase of a capital case
  • “Probable cause to arrest exists when the arresting officer’s knowledge of the particular facts and circumstances is sufficient to warrant a prudent person’s belief that a suspect has committed an offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Holstein, Benton, Limbaugh, Robertson, Covington, O'Shea, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.