Skip to main content
· 2/24/2009

Zink v. State

Citations

  • 278 S.W.3d 170
  • 2009 Mo. LEXIS 19
  • 2009 WL 454283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutors may discuss the concept of mercy because “mercy is a valid sentencing consideration”
  • holding that trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to make a nonmeritorious objection
  • holding that trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to make a nonmeritorious objection
  • noting that when “personality disorders do not affect cognitive abilities, their mitigating value is doubtful”
  • recognizing the “near-complete deference” afforded to trial counsel’s decisions that are “strategic in nature”
  • noting counsel’s strategic trial decisions only may serve as a basis for ineffective assistance of counsel 9 if they are unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patricia Breckenridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.