Supreme Court of Missouri· 8/31/2010
State v. Davis
Citations
- 318 S.W.3d 618
- 2010 WL 2690371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing the reasonable probability test as \the prevailing test\ used by a \host of jurisdictions\
- holding video and stills taken from the video “were potentially prejudicial, but that prejudice arose from the gruesome nature of [defendant’s] crimes, not from any action of the State in the method of presenting the footage and photographs”
- a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to testify on his own behalf at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Laura Denvir Stith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richard D. Davis v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-04-05· cited 98×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-05-29· cited 98×
- People of Michigan v. Johnny Ray KennedyMichigan Supreme Court· 2018-06-29· cited 83×
- State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-08-13· cited 67×
- State of Missouri v. David Russell HosierSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-02-03· cited 66×
- State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-03-06· cited 65×
- State of Missouri v. Chadwick Leland WalterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2016-01-26· cited 62×
- State v. PrinceSupreme Court of Missouri· 2017-12-05· cited 56×
- State of Missouri v. Jesse DriskillSupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-03-31· cited 55×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-01-29· cited 55×
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-07-16· cited 41×
- State of Missouri v. Christopher L. CollingsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-08-19· cited 32×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-05-17· cited 29×
- State v. RoggenbuckSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-12-04· cited 28×
- Shallow v. FollwellSupreme Court of Missouri· 2018-09-11· cited 28×
- State v. CannafaxMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-07-22· cited 24×
- State v. Pete J. VanwinkleArizona Supreme Court· 2012-08-15· cited 21×
- State v. QuickMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-03-01· cited 20×
- State v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-05-17· cited 19×
- Barnett v. RoperE.D. Missouri· 2013-04-22· cited 12×
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,288×
- Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,965×
- Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court· 2000-01-24· cited 840×
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenSixth Circuit· 2004-08-13· cited 361×
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-07-28· cited 282×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-07-25· cited 277×
- Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-05-31· cited 246×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-08-26· cited 232×
- Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentEleventh Circuit· 1987-01-21· cited 227×
- United States v. SarnoNinth Circuit· 1995-12-11· cited 192×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.