Supreme Court of Missouri· 8/26/2003
State v. Edwards
Citations
- 116 S.W.3d 511
- 2003 Mo. LEXIS 125
- 2003 WL 22006845
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that existence of similarly situated veniremembers of a different race that were not stricken is indicative of pretext
- explaining that the “statement that, in evaluating the legitimacy of the prosecutor’s explanation, the court should consider whether (1) the explanation is race-neutral, (2) related to the case to be tried, (3) clear and reasonably specific, and (4
- state unsuccessfully justified peremptory strike by noting a prospective juror worked for the post office
- state unsuccessfully justified peremptory strike by noting a prospective juror worked for the post office
- if defendant does not make certain objection to admission of evidence, then that objection is waived
- when party failed to object on proper grounds, jury could consider inadmissible evidence because party waived objection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Laura Denvir Stith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
196 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-02-24· cited 273×
- State v. ForrestSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-01-10· cited 259×
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-03-18· cited 200×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2006-11-07· cited 170×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-05-26· cited 156×
- Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-02-09· cited 155×
- State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-10· cited 155×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-07-03· cited 146×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-10-27· cited 130×
- State v. BatemanSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-03· cited 120×
- State v. GlassSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-07-01· cited 111×
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-08-24· cited 108×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-08-04· cited 102×
- State v. DeckSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-01-26· cited 98×
- Rodney Clay Evans v. Allen Luebbers, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional CenterEighth Circuit· 2004-08-06· cited 97×
- Forrest v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2009-06-16· cited 81×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-03-09· cited 75×
- State v. MadorieSupreme Court of Missouri· 2005-03-01· cited 75×
- State v. GoffSupreme Court of Missouri· 2004-03-09· cited 69×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 2008-02-19· cited 69×
Cites
105 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 2,053×
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,584×
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 552×
- Lee v. KemnaSupreme Court· 2002-01-22· cited 511×
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-10-26· cited 335×
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-03-26· cited 285×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-07-25· cited 277×
- State v. BernardSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-02-23· cited 262×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-07-21· cited 259×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.