State v. Robinson
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1311
Syllabus
Endangering children obstructing official business Anders brief motion to withdraw ineffective assistance of counsel guilty plea coercion Crim.R. 11 prosecutorial misconduct plain error invited error speedy trial waiver restitution R.C. 2929.18 ability to pay sentence due process judicial bias contrary to law R.C. 2953.08 R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 R.C. 2929.14. Appointed counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Appellant's endangering children and obstructing official business convictions and the trial court's sentence are affirmed. Appellant's guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered it was not improperly coerced by the prosecution. Appellant was not denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. The prosecutor's remarks at sentencing did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct, and appellant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating plain error. Appellant was not denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The trial court's five-year prison sentence is not contrary to law, and the trial court did not commit plain error in ordering appellant to pay restitution. The trial court's sentencing journal entry contains a clerical error with respect to the total amount of restitution. The matter is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of issuing a nunc pro tunc journal entry accurately reflecting the amount of restitution agreed upon by the parties.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-18· cited 9×
- State v. SlaterOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-02· cited 6×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-31· cited 5×
- State v. MarcumOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-07· cited 5×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-12· cited 5×
- State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07· cited 3×
- State v. Hicks-StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-30· cited 2×
- State v. DumasOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-04· cited 1×
- State v. VegaOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-26· cited 1×
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-20· cited 1×
- State v. JordanOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-31· cited 1×
- Cleveland v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-18
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-21
- State v. FrancisOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-20
- State v. BoldenOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-05
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-26
Cites
83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court· 1978-02-15· cited 3,848×
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 3,425×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
- State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 833×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.